An all American conservative boy, here to have fun with interesting conversations and the like. Taken by a lovely girl J.
-
1930 Posts
-
511 Photos
-
0 Videos
-
Followed by 5 people
© 2026 HeyFreaks.com
English
Recent Updates
-
Please log in to like, share and comment!
-
I used to believe in birth control as a means to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and abortions, but I changed my mind. Here’s why.
In 1968, Pope Paul VI wrote Humanae Vitae and was mocked for it. He saw exactly where we were headed.
He predicted that widespread contraception would open the door to more infidelity, a lowering of moral standards, and men viewing women as something to use instead of someone to honor and protect. This is what happens when we separate sex from commitment and from the possibility of life.
Contraception didn’t reduce abortion; it helped build the mindset that made abortion inevitable and provided another opportunity to profit off women’s bodies.
When society is told that it is possible have sex without consequences, the baby is viewed as a failure.
A child is not a failure. We shouldn’t be surprised that a child results from a procreative act.
We fail ourselves by dividing sex from the goodness God created it for. We fail our children by viewing them as accidents.I used to believe in birth control as a means to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and abortions, but I changed my mind. Here’s why. In 1968, Pope Paul VI wrote Humanae Vitae and was mocked for it. He saw exactly where we were headed. He predicted that widespread contraception would open the door to more infidelity, a lowering of moral standards, and men viewing women as something to use instead of someone to honor and protect. This is what happens when we separate sex from commitment and from the possibility of life. Contraception didn’t reduce abortion; it helped build the mindset that made abortion inevitable and provided another opportunity to profit off women’s bodies. When society is told that it is possible have sex without consequences, the baby is viewed as a failure. A child is not a failure. We shouldn’t be surprised that a child results from a procreative act. We fail ourselves by dividing sex from the goodness God created it for. We fail our children by viewing them as accidents.0 Comments 0 Shares 313 Views -
Agreed.. https://x.com/DerrickEvans4WV/status/2064460550143103182
They ruled Iryna’s killer is incompetent to stand trial.
— Derrick Evans (@DerrickEvans4WV) June 9, 2026
The same system ruled this man was plenty competent enough to be released back into society dozens of times.
It’s past time to remove these left wing activist judges. https://t.co/W21yWqLD5f pic.twitter.com/OyPeWbLnwL0 Comments 0 Shares 176 Views -
Stonewall Jackson trusted very few men. He demanded absolute discipline, unquestioning obedience, and relentless aggression. But there was one general whose brilliance he admired—and whose behavior he could never fully forgive. Their partnership helped win battles, yet their personal relationship remained one of the Confederacy’s most complicated rivalries.
Time Period: 1862–1863
Conflict: American Civil War
Key Figures: Stonewall Jackson and A.P. Hill
The image portrays two of the Confederacy's most famous commanders: Lieutenant General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson and Major General Ambrose Powell (A.P.) Hill. Together they helped create some of the most remarkable Confederate victories of the Civil War. Yet behind the battlefield success lay a relationship filled with tension, arguments, and lingering resentment.
When the Civil War intensified in 1862, A.P. Hill emerged as one of the Confederacy's most talented combat commanders. Leading his famous Light Division, Hill developed a reputation for aggressive attacks, rapid movement, and personal courage under fire.
Stonewall Jackson immediately recognized Hill's military ability.
In battle, Hill was often exactly the type of commander Jackson needed. He moved quickly, fought aggressively, and inspired his troops. During the Shenandoah Valley Campaign of 1862, Jackson's lightning-fast victories depended heavily on officers capable of executing difficult orders under extreme pressure.
However, the two men possessed very different personalities.
Jackson was intensely private, deeply religious, and demanded strict obedience from subordinates. Orders were expected to be followed without question. Hill, by contrast, was independent, outspoken, and often challenged decisions he believed were mistaken.
Their disagreements soon became legendary.
Throughout the Valley Campaign, Jackson and Hill repeatedly argued over marching orders, troop movements, and battlefield decisions. On several occasions Jackson accused Hill of moving too slowly or failing to carry out instructions precisely as ordered. Hill, meanwhile, believed Jackson sometimes issued vague or impractical commands.
The tension reached a breaking point during the Seven Days Battles outside Richmond in June 1862.
During one heated dispute, Jackson became so frustrated that he temporarily placed Hill under arrest. Although the arrest did not last long, it revealed just how strained their relationship had become. Few Confederate officers could imagine openly clashing with the feared Stonewall Jackson, yet Hill repeatedly did so.
Despite these personal conflicts, Jackson never doubted Hill's fighting ability.
In fact, some of the Confederacy's greatest successes occurred because Hill's division arrived at critical moments. At Antietam in September 1862, Hill's troops completed a grueling march and arrived just in time to prevent the collapse of Lee's right flank. Their counterattack helped save the Confederate army from potential disaster.
Even Jackson reportedly acknowledged the value of Hill's battlefield leadership.
Yet trust between the two men never fully developed.
Jackson admired Hill's courage but disliked his independence. Hill respected Jackson's military genius but resented what he considered unfair criticism and excessive secrecy. Their relationship became a constant balance between professional respect and personal frustration.
Everything changed in May 1863.
After the Confederate victory at Chancellorsville, Stonewall Jackson was accidentally wounded by Confederate soldiers and later died from complications. The Confederacy lost one of its greatest commanders.
Following Jackson's death, A.P. Hill eventually rose to command a corps in Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. He continued serving with distinction until he was killed near Petersburg in April 1865, just days before Lee's surrender.
Historians still debate exactly what Jackson truly thought of A.P. Hill. What is clear is that Jackson considered Hill difficult, stubborn, and occasionally infuriating. Yet he also knew that Hill was one of the most capable combat commanders in the Confederate army.
In war, mutual admiration does not always create friendship. Sometimes great victories are achieved by men who respected each other's abilities while never fully trusting one anotherStonewall Jackson trusted very few men. He demanded absolute discipline, unquestioning obedience, and relentless aggression. But there was one general whose brilliance he admired—and whose behavior he could never fully forgive. Their partnership helped win battles, yet their personal relationship remained one of the Confederacy’s most complicated rivalries. Time Period: 1862–1863 Conflict: American Civil War Key Figures: Stonewall Jackson and A.P. Hill The image portrays two of the Confederacy's most famous commanders: Lieutenant General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson and Major General Ambrose Powell (A.P.) Hill. Together they helped create some of the most remarkable Confederate victories of the Civil War. Yet behind the battlefield success lay a relationship filled with tension, arguments, and lingering resentment. When the Civil War intensified in 1862, A.P. Hill emerged as one of the Confederacy's most talented combat commanders. Leading his famous Light Division, Hill developed a reputation for aggressive attacks, rapid movement, and personal courage under fire. Stonewall Jackson immediately recognized Hill's military ability. In battle, Hill was often exactly the type of commander Jackson needed. He moved quickly, fought aggressively, and inspired his troops. During the Shenandoah Valley Campaign of 1862, Jackson's lightning-fast victories depended heavily on officers capable of executing difficult orders under extreme pressure. However, the two men possessed very different personalities. Jackson was intensely private, deeply religious, and demanded strict obedience from subordinates. Orders were expected to be followed without question. Hill, by contrast, was independent, outspoken, and often challenged decisions he believed were mistaken. Their disagreements soon became legendary. Throughout the Valley Campaign, Jackson and Hill repeatedly argued over marching orders, troop movements, and battlefield decisions. On several occasions Jackson accused Hill of moving too slowly or failing to carry out instructions precisely as ordered. Hill, meanwhile, believed Jackson sometimes issued vague or impractical commands. The tension reached a breaking point during the Seven Days Battles outside Richmond in June 1862. During one heated dispute, Jackson became so frustrated that he temporarily placed Hill under arrest. Although the arrest did not last long, it revealed just how strained their relationship had become. Few Confederate officers could imagine openly clashing with the feared Stonewall Jackson, yet Hill repeatedly did so. Despite these personal conflicts, Jackson never doubted Hill's fighting ability. In fact, some of the Confederacy's greatest successes occurred because Hill's division arrived at critical moments. At Antietam in September 1862, Hill's troops completed a grueling march and arrived just in time to prevent the collapse of Lee's right flank. Their counterattack helped save the Confederate army from potential disaster. Even Jackson reportedly acknowledged the value of Hill's battlefield leadership. Yet trust between the two men never fully developed. Jackson admired Hill's courage but disliked his independence. Hill respected Jackson's military genius but resented what he considered unfair criticism and excessive secrecy. Their relationship became a constant balance between professional respect and personal frustration. Everything changed in May 1863. After the Confederate victory at Chancellorsville, Stonewall Jackson was accidentally wounded by Confederate soldiers and later died from complications. The Confederacy lost one of its greatest commanders. Following Jackson's death, A.P. Hill eventually rose to command a corps in Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. He continued serving with distinction until he was killed near Petersburg in April 1865, just days before Lee's surrender. Historians still debate exactly what Jackson truly thought of A.P. Hill. What is clear is that Jackson considered Hill difficult, stubborn, and occasionally infuriating. Yet he also knew that Hill was one of the most capable combat commanders in the Confederate army. In war, mutual admiration does not always create friendship. Sometimes great victories are achieved by men who respected each other's abilities while never fully trusting one another0 Comments 0 Shares 283 Views -
Just a little American advice to all my friends in the UK:
It's only treason if you lose.
Godspeed.
The UK is the canary in the coal mine now. We will be dealing with the same here in the US, they're just further along than we are.Just a little American advice to all my friends in the UK: It's only treason if you lose. Godspeed. The UK is the canary in the coal mine now. We will be dealing with the same here in the US, they're just further along than we are.0 Comments 0 Shares 229 Views -
The English: "Don't take any risks. You will go to prison."
The Northern Irish: "Mask up. Leave phones at home. Be prepared to fight and go to prison."The English: "Don't take any risks. You will go to prison." The Northern Irish: "Mask up. Leave phones at home. Be prepared to fight and go to prison."0 Comments 0 Shares 217 Views -
Just a few thoughts to ponder :
Real education is not what you think it is. In fact, most people have never received one.
Today we think of education as a litany of scattered disciplines that you study for careerism and social mobility:
Math is for engineers
Medicine is for doctors
Science is for biologists
Humanities are for poor people (it’s okay, I was an English, Accounting and History majors)
The philosophy of modern education is to pick a discipline, stay in your lane, graduate, and begin your career. But this is not what education is at all — for most of history, education was meant to set you free.
A classical education taught you the seven liberal arts so that your soul could be liberated; freed from confusion and vice, ordered toward wisdom, and capable of living a meaningful life.Just a few thoughts to ponder : Real education is not what you think it is. In fact, most people have never received one. Today we think of education as a litany of scattered disciplines that you study for careerism and social mobility: Math is for engineers Medicine is for doctors Science is for biologists Humanities are for poor people (it’s okay, I was an English, Accounting and History majors) The philosophy of modern education is to pick a discipline, stay in your lane, graduate, and begin your career. But this is not what education is at all — for most of history, education was meant to set you free. A classical education taught you the seven liberal arts so that your soul could be liberated; freed from confusion and vice, ordered toward wisdom, and capable of living a meaningful life.0 Comments 0 Shares 607 Views -
I pity everyone who has never experienced what it’s like to watch the clock for eight hours straight, waiting for the moment when it’s time to resume your axe murder adventures with Raskolnikov.
lol.I pity everyone who has never experienced what it’s like to watch the clock for eight hours straight, waiting for the moment when it’s time to resume your axe murder adventures with Raskolnikov. lol.0 Comments 0 Shares 435 Views -
Can we get a round of applause for Newsom and Bass? They just gave every American a crystal-clear reason to support the SAVE Act.Can we get a round of applause for Newsom and Bass? They just gave every American a crystal-clear reason to support the SAVE Act.0 Comments 0 Shares 378 Views
-
Read the whole thing. And we wonder how and why our schools/colleges, education is so bad today.
https://www.pensandpoison.org/p/how-english-departments-destroyedRead the whole thing. And we wonder how and why our schools/colleges, education is so bad today. https://www.pensandpoison.org/p/how-english-departments-destroyed
WWW.PENSANDPOISON.ORGHow English Departments Destroyed LiteratureI got an A+ for calling Shakespeare transgender. But the problem is so much worse in English departments across the Western world.0 Comments 0 Shares 543 Views
More Stories