Web Analytics
  • Just read this on this news…..and my thoughts.
    ”Elite university students are now incapable of reading a book.

    Instead of fixing this, universities are simply reducing reading requirements to shorter and shorter excerpts.”

    I don't think anybody really grasps how desperate this situation is.

    University professors are now saying they are unable to teach history because reading long books and passages is how a person learns history. College kids are incapable of reading more than a few pages.

    Some classes don't assign any reading at all now, only lectures.

    There is an assumption among the people managing this decline that reading is just a way of receiving information. It isn't. Proper reading is how we build the mental muscle to synthesize ideas and evaluate them.

    If the catastrophic decline in reading and literacy is not addressed now, we risk losing everything.

    Western civilization cannot survive the death of reading because it was built by people with the kind of cognitive depth that a culture of deep reading brings:

    Complex reasoning, extended internal dialogue, the capacity to hold opposing ideas in tension. Our systems and institutions are complex, and they require well ordered minds to maintain them.

    Reading forms minds, and the West was built by the richest minds in history.
    Just read this on this news…..and my thoughts. ”Elite university students are now incapable of reading a book. Instead of fixing this, universities are simply reducing reading requirements to shorter and shorter excerpts.” I don't think anybody really grasps how desperate this situation is. University professors are now saying they are unable to teach history because reading long books and passages is how a person learns history. College kids are incapable of reading more than a few pages. Some classes don't assign any reading at all now, only lectures. There is an assumption among the people managing this decline that reading is just a way of receiving information. It isn't. Proper reading is how we build the mental muscle to synthesize ideas and evaluate them. If the catastrophic decline in reading and literacy is not addressed now, we risk losing everything. Western civilization cannot survive the death of reading because it was built by people with the kind of cognitive depth that a culture of deep reading brings: Complex reasoning, extended internal dialogue, the capacity to hold opposing ideas in tension. Our systems and institutions are complex, and they require well ordered minds to maintain them. Reading forms minds, and the West was built by the richest minds in history.
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 6 Views
  • Stonewall Jackson trusted very few men. He demanded absolute discipline, unquestioning obedience, and relentless aggression. But there was one general whose brilliance he admired—and whose behavior he could never fully forgive. Their partnership helped win battles, yet their personal relationship remained one of the Confederacy’s most complicated rivalries.


    Time Period: 1862–1863
    Conflict: American Civil War
    Key Figures: Stonewall Jackson and A.P. Hill


    The image portrays two of the Confederacy's most famous commanders: Lieutenant General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson and Major General Ambrose Powell (A.P.) Hill. Together they helped create some of the most remarkable Confederate victories of the Civil War. Yet behind the battlefield success lay a relationship filled with tension, arguments, and lingering resentment.


    When the Civil War intensified in 1862, A.P. Hill emerged as one of the Confederacy's most talented combat commanders. Leading his famous Light Division, Hill developed a reputation for aggressive attacks, rapid movement, and personal courage under fire.


    Stonewall Jackson immediately recognized Hill's military ability.


    In battle, Hill was often exactly the type of commander Jackson needed. He moved quickly, fought aggressively, and inspired his troops. During the Shenandoah Valley Campaign of 1862, Jackson's lightning-fast victories depended heavily on officers capable of executing difficult orders under extreme pressure.


    However, the two men possessed very different personalities.


    Jackson was intensely private, deeply religious, and demanded strict obedience from subordinates. Orders were expected to be followed without question. Hill, by contrast, was independent, outspoken, and often challenged decisions he believed were mistaken.


    Their disagreements soon became legendary.


    Throughout the Valley Campaign, Jackson and Hill repeatedly argued over marching orders, troop movements, and battlefield decisions. On several occasions Jackson accused Hill of moving too slowly or failing to carry out instructions precisely as ordered. Hill, meanwhile, believed Jackson sometimes issued vague or impractical commands.


    The tension reached a breaking point during the Seven Days Battles outside Richmond in June 1862.


    During one heated dispute, Jackson became so frustrated that he temporarily placed Hill under arrest. Although the arrest did not last long, it revealed just how strained their relationship had become. Few Confederate officers could imagine openly clashing with the feared Stonewall Jackson, yet Hill repeatedly did so.


    Despite these personal conflicts, Jackson never doubted Hill's fighting ability.


    In fact, some of the Confederacy's greatest successes occurred because Hill's division arrived at critical moments. At Antietam in September 1862, Hill's troops completed a grueling march and arrived just in time to prevent the collapse of Lee's right flank. Their counterattack helped save the Confederate army from potential disaster.


    Even Jackson reportedly acknowledged the value of Hill's battlefield leadership.


    Yet trust between the two men never fully developed.


    Jackson admired Hill's courage but disliked his independence. Hill respected Jackson's military genius but resented what he considered unfair criticism and excessive secrecy. Their relationship became a constant balance between professional respect and personal frustration.


    Everything changed in May 1863.


    After the Confederate victory at Chancellorsville, Stonewall Jackson was accidentally wounded by Confederate soldiers and later died from complications. The Confederacy lost one of its greatest commanders.


    Following Jackson's death, A.P. Hill eventually rose to command a corps in Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. He continued serving with distinction until he was killed near Petersburg in April 1865, just days before Lee's surrender.


    Historians still debate exactly what Jackson truly thought of A.P. Hill. What is clear is that Jackson considered Hill difficult, stubborn, and occasionally infuriating. Yet he also knew that Hill was one of the most capable combat commanders in the Confederate army.


    In war, mutual admiration does not always create friendship. Sometimes great victories are achieved by men who respected each other's abilities while never fully trusting one another
    Stonewall Jackson trusted very few men. He demanded absolute discipline, unquestioning obedience, and relentless aggression. But there was one general whose brilliance he admired—and whose behavior he could never fully forgive. Their partnership helped win battles, yet their personal relationship remained one of the Confederacy’s most complicated rivalries. Time Period: 1862–1863 Conflict: American Civil War Key Figures: Stonewall Jackson and A.P. Hill The image portrays two of the Confederacy's most famous commanders: Lieutenant General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson and Major General Ambrose Powell (A.P.) Hill. Together they helped create some of the most remarkable Confederate victories of the Civil War. Yet behind the battlefield success lay a relationship filled with tension, arguments, and lingering resentment. When the Civil War intensified in 1862, A.P. Hill emerged as one of the Confederacy's most talented combat commanders. Leading his famous Light Division, Hill developed a reputation for aggressive attacks, rapid movement, and personal courage under fire. Stonewall Jackson immediately recognized Hill's military ability. In battle, Hill was often exactly the type of commander Jackson needed. He moved quickly, fought aggressively, and inspired his troops. During the Shenandoah Valley Campaign of 1862, Jackson's lightning-fast victories depended heavily on officers capable of executing difficult orders under extreme pressure. However, the two men possessed very different personalities. Jackson was intensely private, deeply religious, and demanded strict obedience from subordinates. Orders were expected to be followed without question. Hill, by contrast, was independent, outspoken, and often challenged decisions he believed were mistaken. Their disagreements soon became legendary. Throughout the Valley Campaign, Jackson and Hill repeatedly argued over marching orders, troop movements, and battlefield decisions. On several occasions Jackson accused Hill of moving too slowly or failing to carry out instructions precisely as ordered. Hill, meanwhile, believed Jackson sometimes issued vague or impractical commands. The tension reached a breaking point during the Seven Days Battles outside Richmond in June 1862. During one heated dispute, Jackson became so frustrated that he temporarily placed Hill under arrest. Although the arrest did not last long, it revealed just how strained their relationship had become. Few Confederate officers could imagine openly clashing with the feared Stonewall Jackson, yet Hill repeatedly did so. Despite these personal conflicts, Jackson never doubted Hill's fighting ability. In fact, some of the Confederacy's greatest successes occurred because Hill's division arrived at critical moments. At Antietam in September 1862, Hill's troops completed a grueling march and arrived just in time to prevent the collapse of Lee's right flank. Their counterattack helped save the Confederate army from potential disaster. Even Jackson reportedly acknowledged the value of Hill's battlefield leadership. Yet trust between the two men never fully developed. Jackson admired Hill's courage but disliked his independence. Hill respected Jackson's military genius but resented what he considered unfair criticism and excessive secrecy. Their relationship became a constant balance between professional respect and personal frustration. Everything changed in May 1863. After the Confederate victory at Chancellorsville, Stonewall Jackson was accidentally wounded by Confederate soldiers and later died from complications. The Confederacy lost one of its greatest commanders. Following Jackson's death, A.P. Hill eventually rose to command a corps in Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. He continued serving with distinction until he was killed near Petersburg in April 1865, just days before Lee's surrender. Historians still debate exactly what Jackson truly thought of A.P. Hill. What is clear is that Jackson considered Hill difficult, stubborn, and occasionally infuriating. Yet he also knew that Hill was one of the most capable combat commanders in the Confederate army. In war, mutual admiration does not always create friendship. Sometimes great victories are achieved by men who respected each other's abilities while never fully trusting one another
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 589 Views
  • https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=Z43aGvagI-o&si=eRJ_DxnLFy0vKYYK
    https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=Z43aGvagI-o&si=eRJ_DxnLFy0vKYYK
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 416 Views
  • I know that I am.
    I don't know what I am—
    lacking more:
    change or consistency,
    too polite for polite society.


    Through tension,
    the system survives;
    in stasis,
    the system dies.


    Dependent on imagination,
    independent of reality—
    the infinite,
    the end.
    I know that I am. I don't know what I am— lacking more: change or consistency, too polite for polite society. Through tension, the system survives; in stasis, the system dies. Dependent on imagination, independent of reality— the infinite, the end.
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 353 Views
  • Grubunuz için bir başlık girmelisiniz
  • Chaotic.Pandemonium lady h look i found magical thingsss

    You need to watch it in 2160p tho to fully see it properly 🫠

    https://youtu.be/ai6yyiStZAo?si=hUT6krjheLAPgd_k
    [Chaotic.Pandemonium] lady h look i found magical thingsss You need to watch it in 2160p tho to fully see it properly 🫠 https://youtu.be/ai6yyiStZAo?si=hUT6krjheLAPgd_k
    On Fire
    1
    5 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 2K Views
  • Step into the strange, the surreal, and the beautifully bizarre. 🎨✨
    Join me at Xzanthia’s Art Show every first Saturday of the month, 1PM–4PM in Gulfport (St. Pete) and experience original pieces, otherworldly vibes, and a space where oddity meets imagination.
    Scan the code, explore the world, and take home something uniquely haunting. 🖤
    📍1626 49th St S, Gulfport, FL
    🌐 Xzanthia.com
    #Xzanthia #ArtShow #GulfportFL #StPeteArt #SurrealArt #DarkArt #PopSurrealism #LowbrowArt #WeirdArt #ArtCollector #LocalArtScene #FirstSaturday #SupportLocalArtists #ArtLovers #OriginalArt
    Step into the strange, the surreal, and the beautifully bizarre. 🎨✨ Join me at Xzanthia’s Art Show every first Saturday of the month, 1PM–4PM in Gulfport (St. Pete) and experience original pieces, otherworldly vibes, and a space where oddity meets imagination. Scan the code, explore the world, and take home something uniquely haunting. 🖤 📍1626 49th St S, Gulfport, FL 🌐 Xzanthia.com #Xzanthia #ArtShow #GulfportFL #StPeteArt #SurrealArt #DarkArt #PopSurrealism #LowbrowArt #WeirdArt #ArtCollector #LocalArtScene #FirstSaturday #SupportLocalArtists #ArtLovers #OriginalArt
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 8K Views
  • I'm not sure what fuzzy foreign language is on those products, but if it's alcohol...this is the most tragic pic i've ever seen!!!
    I'm not sure what fuzzy foreign language is on those products, but if it's alcohol...this is the most tragic pic i've ever seen!!!
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 2K Views
  • Perhaps there are others here who also work in the IT sector and/or have strong connections to the topic:

    Currently, I am finding it increasingly difficult to continue working in my field, but in general and not explicitly related to my workplace.
    Professionally, I deal with the topic of AI on a daily basis, but also to such an extent that issues such as professional recognition and even promotions depend on excessive use.
    AI undoubtedly has its (sometimes really good) uses. Nevertheless, the ethics of its application on the current global scale seem extremely difficult to me.
    So difficult that I don't know if I want to remain in this profession with a clear conscience, because I am no longer an IT consultant or developer, but rather feel like an AI coordinator whose job it is to mediate cleanly between humans and machines.
    I am currently observing how jobs are increasingly being outsourced to AI. Either actively, by no longer advertising the positions, or passively, by dismissing everything that can be replaced via personnel interviews with seemingly flimsy justifications (you can always find a way to get rid of someone Unwanted).
    And global experience shows how wonderful this outsourcing of work is: work becomes less valuable, company owners pocket the dividends, and the social divide grows ever wider.

    I chose this profession to solve problems and help people, to specialize in consulting and service, to actively help people, to identify challenges that I am familiar with, and to support them. Even when the day was long and difficult, I could go home with a clear conscience. Because when the problem was solved, my customers were grateful and happy—and so was I, because I was able to help someone.
    Today, I have become part of the problem. I no longer help to support people, but to replace them—and I am just waiting to be replaced myself.
    I used to have the desire to continue my education in my field, to live my life and to learn. Now I no longer know why I should.

    The future and the existence I had once envisioned, the “healthy world,” are no longer there.
    And in the evenings, when darkness descends, I can hardly sleep. With my eyes closed, I lie awake, feeling paralyzed, as if my thoughts are constantly running into a wall. I don't dare talk about it with those around me because I only see myself as a burden on the world. I think no one needs my problems—everyone is struggling with their own, and I am just another burden, another eyesore in an already fragile world.
    How can I still represent the hope and confidence of a world that is dying, when I am a correspondent of its murder?
    Perhaps there are others here who also work in the IT sector and/or have strong connections to the topic: Currently, I am finding it increasingly difficult to continue working in my field, but in general and not explicitly related to my workplace. Professionally, I deal with the topic of AI on a daily basis, but also to such an extent that issues such as professional recognition and even promotions depend on excessive use. AI undoubtedly has its (sometimes really good) uses. Nevertheless, the ethics of its application on the current global scale seem extremely difficult to me. So difficult that I don't know if I want to remain in this profession with a clear conscience, because I am no longer an IT consultant or developer, but rather feel like an AI coordinator whose job it is to mediate cleanly between humans and machines. I am currently observing how jobs are increasingly being outsourced to AI. Either actively, by no longer advertising the positions, or passively, by dismissing everything that can be replaced via personnel interviews with seemingly flimsy justifications (you can always find a way to get rid of someone Unwanted). And global experience shows how wonderful this outsourcing of work is: work becomes less valuable, company owners pocket the dividends, and the social divide grows ever wider. I chose this profession to solve problems and help people, to specialize in consulting and service, to actively help people, to identify challenges that I am familiar with, and to support them. Even when the day was long and difficult, I could go home with a clear conscience. Because when the problem was solved, my customers were grateful and happy—and so was I, because I was able to help someone. Today, I have become part of the problem. I no longer help to support people, but to replace them—and I am just waiting to be replaced myself. I used to have the desire to continue my education in my field, to live my life and to learn. Now I no longer know why I should. The future and the existence I had once envisioned, the “healthy world,” are no longer there. And in the evenings, when darkness descends, I can hardly sleep. With my eyes closed, I lie awake, feeling paralyzed, as if my thoughts are constantly running into a wall. I don't dare talk about it with those around me because I only see myself as a burden on the world. I think no one needs my problems—everyone is struggling with their own, and I am just another burden, another eyesore in an already fragile world. How can I still represent the hope and confidence of a world that is dying, when I am a correspondent of its murder?
    Goth Vibes
    1
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 9K Views
Sponsorluk
Sponsorluk
HeyFreaks.com https://heyfreaks.com